why we dont have a ranged low bleed anymore. it seem like a nerf on purpose instead of changing game mechanics. first disabled boar rush's mezz on assailment and now ranged offansive strike doesnt apply low bleed. why is this happened ? any can explain that ?
I've been moorsing quite a bit lately, so a low bleed in Assailment would absolutely make my day. That would take our ranged bleed total from 2 up to 3... doesn't seem game-breaking to me. Yeah, there are some Fist bleeds you can use in Assail. but you need to be close to use those except for the Fierce Resolve line, and if you're going to fight in melee range you might as well be in Reck. stance imo.
Last edited by kermie-lee; Jul 02 2012 at 02:40 PM.
Dunno if its a bug or not, but I can maybe understand the reasoning....
(BP) 13, Ambush, fire. (13)1, fire. 1(31)3, fire. JT. By the time they can get in melee range, you have 4 stacking bleeds and scored two Removal bonuses. Probably have time to land another gambit or a Jav skill, too, if you have 40m range. Thats a hell of an alpha strike.
No 13 bleed means 1 less bleed and 1 less Removal bonus for that same sequence, FWIW.