Thread: Show us your unbuffed stats, gear set up!

here is a link to mine:

As much of a forum troll you can be; I've played with your RK and you are a beast in PvE.

looks great. I was wondering what name of the necklace was, could anyone tell me?

Originally Posted by ifreborn1

here is a link to mine:

I run two set different set up when I am healing and when I am meant to hit hard.

Healing
http://imageshack.us/f/836/healingsetup.jpg/

Fire
http://imageshack.us/f/62/firesetup.jpg/

Originally Posted by ifreborn1

here is a link to mine:

Can you post your LIs please.

Originally Posted by Nokor

I run two set different set up when I am healing and when I am meant to hit hard.

Healing
http://imageshack.us/f/836/healingsetup.jpg/

Fire
http://imageshack.us/f/62/firesetup.jpg/

Why haven't you used the LI points on tactical healing on your 1st age healing satchel? (At least i think you haven't)

You should check again then, i think.

The cap for tactical healing is 38.8 rating on RK satchels

Nokor,very nice stats,though, im pretty sure putting a -2.5% atk duration on a fire stone/satchel is wrong choice. its useful just for lightning where u dont have inductions, on fire, where u move from induction to another induction,the attack duration is minor(could've been nice if it was -2.5% inductions or something). and may i ask what is ur 2nd bracelet, not the root's poisoner one

[Diamond-Flecked Wristlet]: http://lorebook.lotro.com/wiki/Item:...ecked_Wristlet

Well i thought so too, but the only other offence relic for tactical mastery is [Extraordinary Rune of Power] which has 520 mastery, 22 fate and 146 physical mitigation. My relic has 26 will, -2.5% attack duration and 584 evade rating. Now if you compare them only on an offence level I loose and gain:

520 mastery rating
vs.
-5% attack duration

Now my reasoning is that in fire, there is an attack duration after using fiery ridicule, now this was very important before ieof was nerfed to only 1 skill, not 5s. My reasoning is simple, that at 34k offence you get hit by DR quite a bit, so the extra 520 offence would not be as valuable. The damage feels quicker, but I'm not sure if this is actually true. Since 70-80% of all damage in fire originates from fr, but again if the 520 rating vs. -5% attack duration makes it more useful, I'm not sure.