Thread: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
-
Oct 01 2009 06:45 PM #121
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Before I started leading raids in book 13 to moria
I believe I got to 1.982 rating before I died.

the aftermath....
Lieutenant Edelbrock Rank 10 Reaver / Taskmaster Edeluk Rank 9 Warleader Brandywhine Organization of Freep Spies
Lieutenant Edelrock Rank 10 Champion / Edelbrock Rank 7 Captain / Dwit rank 6 Guardian Silverlode Apathy
Virtues Rank 6 Warleader Silverlode The Moors Rejects
-
Oct 01 2009 06:51 PM #122
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
And the spider I haven't played in forever
Lieutenant Edelbrock Rank 10 Reaver / Taskmaster Edeluk Rank 9 Warleader Brandywhine Organization of Freep Spies
Lieutenant Edelrock Rank 10 Champion / Edelbrock Rank 7 Captain / Dwit rank 6 Guardian Silverlode Apathy
Virtues Rank 6 Warleader Silverlode The Moors Rejects
-
Oct 01 2009 07:48 PM #123
-
Oct 29 2009 06:45 PM #124
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Why has no one posted in this thread in a long while?
Lets see the war tabs ppl.
-
Oct 29 2009 09:38 PM #125
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Defilers FTW.

I'm an anomaly of conversation, I'm honoring confrontation.
-
Oct 30 2009 09:10 AM #126
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
-
Oct 30 2009 09:33 PM #127
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.

Chieftain Evilspinnre Meledraniath Slayer of Light, Lore-Masters Foe, Hunters-Foe, Elf-Bane, Man-Slayer, Minstrels-Foe, Hobbit-Foe, Rune keepers Foe, Dwarf Foe, Snitch Killer, Champions Foe, Captains Foe, Guardians Foe
-
Oct 31 2009 01:00 AM #128
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
-
Oct 31 2009 01:17 AM #129
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
You're rank 10 but haven't got harvester? But almost same kills and 150k more inf =D

Chieftain Evilspinnre Meledraniath Slayer of Light, Lore-Masters Foe, Hunters-Foe, Elf-Bane, Man-Slayer, Minstrels-Foe, Hobbit-Foe, Rune keepers Foe, Dwarf Foe, Snitch Killer, Champions Foe, Captains Foe, Guardians Foe
-
Oct 31 2009 12:41 PM #130
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
I led alot of raids. (esp as a secondary target assist for Edel; see above) Not until Moria have I gone solely to small grouping/soloing.
Also I am not concerned with KBs because they do not further improve my renown/infamy gain.Last edited by featherlight111; Oct 31 2009 at 12:49 PM.
-
Oct 31 2009 03:19 PM #131
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
So, you think you can tell Heaven from Hell?
Blue skies from pain? Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail?
A smile from a veil?
So you think you can tell..
-
Oct 31 2009 05:28 PM #132
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.

-
Oct 31 2009 05:36 PM #133
-
Oct 31 2009 05:45 PM #134
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.

-
Oct 31 2009 05:56 PM #135
-
Oct 31 2009 06:22 PM #136
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
I guess I should post my Harvestor pic aswell then
Though I almost regret not wearing my LM foe title, I love it.

Looks like Evil got in less infamy then me, oh well I think I have almost half the kills though.
You might also notice my hatchlings are up to 262 KB's lol I hate them
-Morrdan/Weaver/PreLast edited by BIZL; Oct 31 2009 at 06:30 PM.
-
Oct 31 2009 06:46 PM #137
-
Oct 31 2009 07:42 PM #138
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
What information can you get from an infamy to KB ratio? If you have more infamy per KB that could because you got more solo kills. And if you had very little infamy to KB's you could say thats because almost all your infamy comes from KB's...
I dunno, it doesnt make much sense as a measurement to me.
Kills to KB ratio is probably better. My reaver has a 2.9 Kill:Kb ratio but my spider is just over 5, because when I group I focus on CC.
-Morrdan/Weaver/Pre
-
Oct 31 2009 08:11 PM #139
-
Oct 31 2009 08:22 PM #140
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Good Isen is a requirement to join my raids.

Chieftain Evilspinnre Meledraniath Slayer of Light, Lore-Masters Foe, Hunters-Foe, Elf-Bane, Man-Slayer, Minstrels-Foe, Hobbit-Foe, Rune keepers Foe, Dwarf Foe, Snitch Killer, Champions Foe, Captains Foe, Guardians Foe
-
Oct 31 2009 08:59 PM #141
-
Oct 31 2009 09:08 PM #142
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
He probably will. I'm still incredibly rusty after a 3 month break. Hell, a warden got me to 900.

Chieftain Evilspinnre Meledraniath Slayer of Light, Lore-Masters Foe, Hunters-Foe, Elf-Bane, Man-Slayer, Minstrels-Foe, Hobbit-Foe, Rune keepers Foe, Dwarf Foe, Snitch Killer, Champions Foe, Captains Foe, Guardians Foe
-
Oct 31 2009 11:45 PM #143
-
Nov 01 2009 12:53 AM #144
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Dirtyblonde 65 Burg (Nimrodel) | Notblondie (Nimrodel) | Scratchs (Elendilmir)
[OOC] ****** : 'except blondie, hes already GM smartass'
Blame the players.
Battlefield Heroes is really fun!
-
Nov 01 2009 02:29 AM #145
-
Nov 01 2009 07:49 AM #146
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.

Chieftain Evilspinnre Meledraniath Slayer of Light, Lore-Masters Foe, Hunters-Foe, Elf-Bane, Man-Slayer, Minstrels-Foe, Hobbit-Foe, Rune keepers Foe, Dwarf Foe, Snitch Killer, Champions Foe, Captains Foe, Guardians Foe
-
Nov 01 2009 10:02 AM #147
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
What information can you get from the categories you listed? Inf/KB shows that an individual makes an effort to claim killing blows, Inf/Kills shows how much of a soloist you are, etc.
None of this information is worthwhile, it tell us nothing about how skillful a player is, all it hints at is a particular play style.
* * *


-
Nov 01 2009 12:07 PM #148
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
well technically it looks like your hatchlings have 132 (by the screeny)
slayer of light + 3010 - War tab = Hatchling KB's
You still didnt answer what inf/KB means.....
It's impossible to prove "skill" with any numbers, both categories I listed at least prove something, what does inf/KB prove?
- Morrdan/Weaver/Pre
-
Nov 01 2009 12:49 PM #149
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
You proved nothing, all you did was show what conclusions might be drawn from certain stats. I'm sure there are Blackarrows out there with fantastic inf/kill ratios, what facts can be ascertained from that? Blackarrows are great at hoarding infamy. So, once again; the stats you have chosen to focus upon prove nothing.
You said: And I replied with: Both of the above statements are very basic conclusions which attempt to explain what certain stats mean, so I'm rather baffled by why "proof" is required and even more baffled by why you haven't presented any yourself.
-
Nov 01 2009 01:01 PM #150
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
How in the world does it mean that? Technically you want inf/kb as low as possible since that means you have a lot of kbs for very low infamy. (which could just mean you are a ninja.) This once again means almost nothing.
Inf/kill can be at least understood. Pointing to playstyle is a type of information. If it is very low then the person is a raider. If it is very high then the person solos and 1v1s a lot.
K/kb makes sense since it shows how many kills you were at least actively part of. If (on a dps class) this is high then it means you leeched a lot of kills. I guess leeched is a bit harsh but still. If it is low then you are either a very good ninja or 1v1/solo constantly. Same as inf/kill.
You can draw your own opinions from that but at least these two show some kind of obvious playstyle choice.Dirtyblonde 65 Burg (Nimrodel) | Notblondie (Nimrodel) | Scratchs (Elendilmir)
[OOC] ****** : 'except blondie, hes already GM smartass'
Blame the players.
Battlefield Heroes is really fun!
-
Nov 01 2009 01:15 PM #151
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
How in the world doesn't it? If you sport a lot of killing blow titles for the amount of infamy you have it's pretty safe to assume you've made some effort to acquire KBs.
As for the rest of your post, I never claimed that inf/kb tells us more about someone than their inf/kills does. Your friend got on to the subject of what's "better" (which is totally subjective so let's not go there) and then made a bizarre request for "proof".
-
Nov 01 2009 01:25 PM #152
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
well I did say:
Which is what you seem to be saying. I just do not see that as a measure of anything tbh. Like you said in your original post, being a reaver helps with that a lot. In fact you can have horrible stats everywhere else and do nothing but DS low health targets (ds gives a big chunk of infamy anyway, at least usually) and have a great inf/kb. Not saying you are wrong in seeing it as it is. Just for me it holds very little meaning. I may just be misunderstanding the stat.Technically you want inf/kb as low as possible since that means you have a lot of kbs for very low infamy. (which could just mean you are a ninja.)
I never said you did, I was just posting my own thoughts and analogies. Proof was just a word that seemed to fit. I almost used it. Proving a certain playstyle is more accurate I guess, either way I used another word instead just to cause less confusion. He probably did not see it as a big deal.As for the rest of your post, I never claimed that inf/kb tells us more about someone than their inf/kills does. Your friend got on to the subject of what's "better" (which is totally subjective so let's not go there) and then made a bizarre request for "proof".Dirtyblonde 65 Burg (Nimrodel) | Notblondie (Nimrodel) | Scratchs (Elendilmir)
[OOC] ****** : 'except blondie, hes already GM smartass'
Blame the players.
Battlefield Heroes is really fun!
-
Nov 01 2009 04:22 PM #153
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Try to understand why I dont think inf/KB makes sense.
I solo someone. I get 120 infamy and 1 KB
Some blackarrow ninja's a KB and gets 2 infamy and 1 KB.
In this case it looks like having a high infamy/KB ratio better.
But conversly I could play in a group all night get 4,000 infamy and only 5 KB's
That same BA plays all night and also gets 4,000 infamy but lands 60 KB's.
Well now the siutation is reversed and having a low infamy/KB is better.
At least in my examples they can only be interpreted one way, whatever your views on that playstyle are. Also I only used the word "proof" to say that it IMPOSSIBLE for any number to prove "skill" which was my response to your statement that my numbers didnt prove "skill". They dont prove skill, they suggest a playstyle, whereas your numbers dont really suggest anything at all (as you can see from my above example)
-Morrdan/Weaver/PreLast edited by BIZL; Nov 01 2009 at 04:25 PM.
-
Nov 01 2009 07:47 PM #154
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
I agree that it will be really hard to quantify a "skilled' play vs. a non-skilled player.
There is a lot that goes into playing well in the moors besides just getting the stats that are revealed on the war tab, but besides that... any simple equation like infamy/xyz can clearly be distorted.Last edited by Dommin-Nim; Nov 01 2009 at 07:50 PM.
~ Amamadan <retired>, Level 65 Champion of Legends <retired>, Rank 4 on Nim
~~ Elthros <retired>, Level 60 Minstrel of Legends <retired>, Rank 4
~~ Methodis <retired>, Level 60 Runekeeper
~ Accuracy <retired>, Blackarrow of Black Blade <still pwning>, Rank 9 on Nim
-
Nov 01 2009 08:21 PM #155
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
none of the stats: kb/kills, k/d, kills/infamy reflect any sort of "skill". It reflects more so how the player plays. Safe players will ultimately have a higher k/d ratio, while solo'ers (whether they are good or not) will have a higher infamy/kill ratio. Any leeching ba can obtain a good infamy/kill ratio or a good k/d ratio. I really don't see how those stats reflect skill at all simply how the palyer wants to play. The ba could be good and obtain those good stats or he could be an awful player and still acquire the stats.
I can think of countless excellent players whose war tabs are abysmal because they prefer to be in a raid/group. IMO wartabs are a portrayal of how you play, not how good you are.
-
Nov 02 2009 12:48 AM #156
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
He was actually right. I do play for kb's, not infamy. I would have a lot more but between book 12 and 14 I raided. There was usually 4-5 more reavers in the raid and we were all very good at making things die really quick. I also think stats don't really show if you're a good player or not. Too many variables. For one, I use to let my 10 year old, autistic brother play my reaver when I use to watch him. The only infamy I would get when he played is from the reflect damage while he was getting blown up. I also went from around a 35 k/d ratio to 20 when book 6 came out. Since then it has gone up about 1. If people saw how bad it was and just waited for book 7 then their k/d ratio would be higher. Does that make them a better player?? No

-
Nov 02 2009 12:53 AM #157
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Do not get me wrong. Stats do not make you a good player. I know people with horrible stats that I would give my life to save. I also know people that try and mimic these stats just to make themselves look good, while they could not tell their *** from their face in a fight.
People play for themselves in the end. What is fun for them is usually how they will play. I see no reason to criticize anyone for that. They pay for their games not me. Stats only support the playstyle you chose. (Whether the stats are for your own personal goals or to show off your ability to play a certain way)Dirtyblonde 65 Burg (Nimrodel) | Notblondie (Nimrodel) | Scratchs (Elendilmir)
[OOC] ****** : 'except blondie, hes already GM smartass'
Blame the players.
Battlefield Heroes is really fun!
-
Nov 02 2009 07:58 AM #158
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Less ****ing arguing and more war-tabs!

Chieftain Evilspinnre Meledraniath Slayer of Light, Lore-Masters Foe, Hunters-Foe, Elf-Bane, Man-Slayer, Minstrels-Foe, Hobbit-Foe, Rune keepers Foe, Dwarf Foe, Snitch Killer, Champions Foe, Captains Foe, Guardians Foe
-
Nov 02 2009 09:49 AM #159
-
Nov 02 2009 09:56 AM #160
Re: Offical Creep War-Tab thread.
Irezii~R10 Weaver “The field of battle serves as a garden from which you reap the heads of the fallen. You are a true harvester of sorrow.” ~ Harvester of Sorrow <The Black Blade>
Linnleii~65 R5 Hunter <Order of the Phoenix> ---Nimrodel---
Highest Ranked Creep List






Reply With Quote


